Guides

Substantial Holder Notices: Why Banks File So Many

A substantial holder notice does not always mean an investor has arrived. Banks and brokers also file them for shares they lend, borrow or hold as collateral, and their notices cluster on the ASX’s most shorted stocks.

18 min read
A blank ivory card tilts out of a blackened-steel card frame screwed to a dark oak wall, as a second blank card with burnt-amber edges crosses over it on its way in.

A substantial holder notice says that a person, with its associates, has a relevant interest in 5% or more of a listed company's votes, and a relevant interest is wider than ownership. Banks and brokers file these notices for shares they have lent out, borrowed or taken as collateral as well as shares they own, and their notices cluster where short selling is heaviest.

In ASIC's short position report for 15 October 2026, 12 of the 16 companies with 10% or more of their shares reported short had a bank or broker among their current substantial holders on Shorted's records. Of the 445 with less than 1% short, 19 did, leaving out MUFG, the Japanese banking group, where its notice only repeats its own fund manager's figure. This guide explains what the notices are and who files them, quotes what the banks' notices actually say, follows DroneShield through 38 of them, and shows how to read a register without counting the same shares twice. The figures come from Shorted's ownership data, which reads each notice's PDF, and from the notices themselves.

Substantial holding notices on Shorted, late November 2025 to 20 October 2026
notices parsed into records
6,367
2,633 more documents set aside
of them filed by banks and brokers
1,911
30% of the parsed total
on DroneShield
38
27 from JPMorgan and Citigroup
of companies 10% or more short have a bank or broker substantial holder
75%
12 of 16, ASIC report for 15 October

Shorted's ownership job has read the 9,000 most recent notice documents in its ASX announcements feed, released from 26 November 2025 to 20 October 2026. It turned 6,367 into records (Forms 603, 604 and 605, plus 55 New Zealand disclosures for dual-listed companies) and set 2,633 aside rather than guess: 1,284 were scans with no text layer, 913 had a voting power it could not read unambiguously, 288 could not be tied to one company or one holder, 60 failed to download, 55 contained no Australian or New Zealand form (a covering letter filed alone, or a foreign form such as the Irish TR-1 that James Hardie forwards), and 33 contained figures that contradicted the form or the company's share count. Every count below is of parsed notices.

What a substantial holder notice is

Section 671B of the Corporations Act 2001 requires a person to tell the company and ASX when they begin or cease to have a substantial holding, when there is "a movement of at least 1%" in their holding, and when they make a takeover bid. A substantial holding, defined in section 9, is a relevant interest, together with associates, in 5% or more of the votes attached to the company's voting shares. The 1% is measured in percentage points from the figure last disclosed: JPMorgan's DroneShield notice released on 4 August, for a change on 30 July, went from 5.15% to 6.68%, a movement of 1.53 points.

The notice goes in a prescribed form, and the announcements appear on ASX under matching headlines:

FormTitle on the formASX headline
603Notice of initial substantial holderBecoming a substantial holder
604Notice of change of interests of substantial holderChange in substantial holding
605Notice of ceasing to be a substantial holderCeasing to be a substantial holder

The deadline is two business days after the holder becomes aware of the information, or 9.30 am on the next trading day if it becomes aware during a takeover bid (s671B(6)). The information must be given "even if the situation changes by the time the information is to be given", in the words of Note 2 to s671B(1).

Relevant interest is the term that matters, and it is wider than ownership. Under section 608(1) a person has one if they are the holder of the securities, have power to exercise or control the exercise of a right to vote attached to them, or have power to dispose of them or control their disposal. "It does not matter how remote the relevant interest is or how it arises." Section 608(3) adds the relevant interests of any company in which the person's voting power is above 20%, or which it controls, and s671B(7) also counts interests through market traded options, derivatives that give a right to acquire the shares, and conditional agreements. ASIC's Regulatory Guide 5 puts it plainly: a relevant interest "encompasses connections wider than ownership".

Who files the most

Substantial holder notices parsed by Shorted, by filer, late November 2025 to 20 October 2026
  1. State Street1,117
  2. JPMorgan Chase388
  3. UBS338
  4. MUFG336
  5. Citigroup336
  6. Macquarie Group331
  7. First Sentier Group291
  8. Regal Partners159
  9. Pinnacle141
  10. Vanguard135

State Street's notices combine two businesses: the index funds of State Street Global Advisors, and State Street Bank and Trust Company, a custodian that lends securities. Its Flight Centre notice released on 6 October lists shares held "as investment manager or trustee" beside three kinds of lending interest: lent securities, where "State Street Bank and Trust Company has lent the securities and retains a relevant interest"; collateral, held as a right "as lender, to dispose of shares transferred to secure a securities loan"; and borrowed securities it "has on-lent". Either business can move the combined figure by the point that requires a new notice: on Flight Centre, State Street went from 6.93% to 7.97% (released 6 October), to 6.95% (12 October) and to 8.11% (19 October).

In the notices Shorted could read, five of the next six filers are banks or brokers. Together, banks and brokers filed 1,911 of the 6,367 parsed notices (30.0%), and three in four of theirs (1,462, or 76.5%) were Forms 603 or 605, the forms for becoming and for ceasing to be a substantial holder. Across all other filers combined, fewer than half were (2,095 of 4,456, or 47.0%): the index managers, led by State Street, came to 59.8% (809 of 1,352) and everyone else to 41.4% (1,286 of 3,104). MUFG's 336 include notices that count the interests of First Sentier, which it owns, and of Morgan Stanley, in which it has more than 20% of the votes; both also file their own.

Two caveats travel with these counts. They cover only the notices Shorted could read, so a filer whose forms are scanned, or whose figures sit only in an annexure, is undercounted: BlackRock files its signed form pages as scans, so Shorted can read little but its 605s, which need no figure; they are 53 of its 56 parsed notices. And the kind "bank or broker" comes from Shorted's curated registry of each institution's dominant business, not from the notices.

Why a bank can be a substantial holder of shares it does not own

Securities lending will generally result in both the lender and the borrower having a relevant interest in the securities.

That sentence is from the key points of section D of ASIC's Regulatory Guide 222, issued in its current form on 30 July 2026. The borrower has a relevant interest under s608(1) once it has a legally binding commitment to borrow particular securities; the lender keeps one through its right to recall the shares, which s608(8) turns into a right to control their disposal (RG 222.60). A lender is also likely to acquire a relevant interest in securities a borrower delivers as collateral (RG 222.61). Custodians that lend their clients' shares as agent lenders, and prime brokers with a right to borrow their clients' securities, have relevant interests too (RG 222 sections E and F). Securities lending "can, but does not always, occur ahead of, or as part of, short selling activity", ASIC adds; it is also used to cover potential failed trades, for dividend-driven transactions and around corporate actions, including voting (RG 222.52).

The DroneShield notices say the same thing in the filers' own words. JPMorgan's latest, a Form 604 for 30 July 2026 released on 4 August, puts its interest at 61,703,608 votes, or 6.68%. Section 4 of the notice divides that total by the nature of each interest, and 85.6% of it is lending: 38,176,408 shares are "Securities on Loan as Agent Lender", lent out by JPMorgan Chase Bank acting as agent, and 14,616,891 are held by JPMorgan companies "subject to an obligation to return under a securities lending agreement". Its loan schedule records the borrower as the holder of the voting rights.

Citigroup's Form 603, released on 12 October, says it became a substantial holder on 8 October with 46,964,998 shares, or 5.0754%. Each of the four Citigroup companies holding them describes its interest in lending terms: Citibank's Sydney branch "acting as Agent Lender and as the holder of securities subject to an obligation to return under a securities lending agreement", the other three "pursuant to contracts entered into subject to an obligation to return under a securities lending agreement", two of them also through contracts "in the ordinary course of business on a stock market". Annexure A sets out the loans: voting rights held by the "Borrower", a return date that is "Unknown", and both sides able to end a loan early.

A bank's notice is not always about lending. UBS's Form 604 on Lynas for 16 July 2026, released on 20 July, puts UBS at 98,107,131 votes, or 9.75%, and most of that is options: 76,477,200 votes that UBS Securities Australia holds as "Beneficial Owner". Interests held as "Fund Manager" account for 18,324,473 more, and stock borrowing, lending and prime broking for 2,878,898.

What two bank notices are made of, by the nature of each interest (shares of each notice rounded)
NoticeNature of the interest, as the notice describes itVotesShare of notice
JPMorgan on DroneShield, 30 Jul 2026, 6.68%"Securities on Loan as Agent Lender"38,176,40861.9%
"Holder of securities subject to an obligation to return under a securities lending agreement"14,616,89123.7%
"Purchase and sales of securities in its capacity as Principal/Proprietary"7,694,66812.5%
"In its capacity as investment manager or in various other related capacities"1,215,6412.0%
UBS on Lynas, 16 Jul 2026, 9.75%Options held as "Beneficial Owner"76,477,20078.0%
"Fund Manager with power to exercise control over voting shares"18,324,47318.7%
Stock borrowing and lending, securities lending agreements and a prime broking agreement2,878,8982.9%
Shares and ADRs held as "Beneficial Owner", and "Broker with power to exercise discretion over account"426,5600.4%

Shorted classes JPMorgan, Citigroup and UBS as one kind, bank or broker, and its note on that kind reads: "Mostly securities lending: shares lent to, or held as collateral from, short sellers." That is a rule of thumb about the kind, not a reading of each notice, and the UBS notice shows why the difference matters.

The in-and-out pattern: DroneShield

DroneShield has 38 parsed notices on record, released from 27 November 2025 to 12 October 2026, and 27 of them are from JPMorgan and Citigroup. A 39th, a "Becoming a substantial holder" released on 30 March 2026, is withheld because its voting power could not be read.

JPMorgan's 18 are seven 603s, four 604s and seven 605s. Going by the date of each change, it ceased to be a substantial holder on 24 November 2025 and on 2 January, 9 January, 30 January, 2 April, 5 May and 8 May 2026, and became one again on 26 November, 7 January, 12 January, 20 March, 7 April, 7 May and 17 July. Its current 6.68% is from the 604 for 30 July. Citigroup's nine notices follow the same rhythm over five months:

Every Citigroup substantial holding notice on DroneShield, May to October 2026
ReleasedFormVoting power
13 May 2026603, became substantial on 11 May5.1197%
14 May 2026605, ceasedbelow 5%
27 May 2026603, became substantial on 25 May5.0006%
28 May 2026605, ceasedbelow 5%
2 Jun 2026603, became substantial on 29 May5.2578%
4 Jun 2026605, ceasedbelow 5%
7 Aug 2026603, became substantial on 5 Aug5.6853%
8 Oct 2026605, ceasedbelow 5%
12 Oct 2026603, became substantial on 8 Oct5.0754%

The repetition is what the law asks for. A holding made up largely of loans can sit near 5% and cross it in both directions as loans open and close, and every crossing needs a notice. ASIC's guidance says a borrower that obtains a substantial holding through securities lending must give a notice "even if the holding is only temporary" (RG 222.72), and that returning lent securities or selling them on market may call for a notice of ceasing (RG 222.74).

On Shorted's records DroneShield has four current substantial holders: State Street at 7.74% (a 604 for 2 September), JPMorgan at 6.68%, FMR, the parent of Fidelity, at 5.70% (a 604 for 28 August) and Citigroup at 5.0754%. ASIC's report for 15 October shows 16.40% of DroneShield's shares reported short, the highest of any ASX-listed company. The company tab lists all four, each with a link to its notice.

Where bank notices meet short interest

Companies with a bank or broker substantial holder, by reported short position, ASIC report for 15 October 2026
  1. 10% or more short (12 of 16)75.0%
  2. 5% to 10% (16 of 53)30.2%
  3. 2% to 5% (17 of 95)17.9%
  4. 1% to 2% (13 of 95)13.7%
  5. Under 1% (19 of 445)4.3%

The companies are the 704 in ASIC's report for 15 October 2026 that Shorted's most-shorted list ranks (the list leaves out ETFs and hybrids, and the page shows its top 100), and a holder counts when its latest notice leaves it substantial. MUFG counts First Sentier's interests in its own notices, so where MUFG's figure is exactly First Sentier's, it is left out. That removes 15 companies on which MUFG is the only bank or broker on record, among them Genesis Minerals, Beach Energy, AUB Group and Catapult Sports. Of the 25 most shorted, 16 have a bank or broker substantial holder; of the top ten, nine do. Across all 704, 77 do, or 10.9%.

The ten most shorted ASX companies and their bank or broker substantial holders
RankCompanyShort, 15 Oct 2026Bank or broker holders on record (voting power, notice released)
1DroneShield (DRO)16.40%JPMorgan 6.68% (4 Aug); Citigroup 5.0754% (12 Oct)
2Lotus Resources (LOT)15.48%JPMorgan 6.64% (14 Oct)
3Boss Energy (BOE)14.68%JPMorgan 8.30% (16 Oct)
4Zip Co (ZIP)13.59%Bank of America 5.24% (11 Sep)
5PLS Group (PLS)13.08%MUFG 7.17% (20 Oct); Morgan Stanley 5.31% (16 Oct)
6IperionX (IPX)12.99%JPMorgan 7.68% (30 Sep)
7Paladin Energy (PDN)12.09%JPMorgan 6.63% (20 Oct)
8Domino's Pizza Enterprises (DMP)11.89%Citigroup 8.6998% (10 Sep)
9Lynas Rare Earths (LYC)11.73%UBS 9.75% (20 Jul)
10WiseTech Global (WTC)11.08%None on record

The association fits the mechanism ASIC describes, where a lender and a borrower both hold a relevant interest in lent shares. But one day's cross-section cannot show that any particular holding is a loan, and a bank's notice can be mostly options, as UBS's Lynas notice is. Each figure in the table links to its notice and is as at that notice, and none of the notices says who sold short.

Why the figures on a register do not add up

DroneShield's four current notices add to 25.20%, and ASIC's report has 16.40% of its shares reported short. The 25.20% is not a share of DroneShield owned by four investors, for three reasons.

The same shares can sit in several notices. ASIC notes that "a number of securities lending transactions will result in a chain of people having a relevant interest in the same securities" (RG 222.62). A borrower that sells the shares on market loses its relevant interest (RG 222.63), but ASIC's relief lets the lender keep recognising its own, "even though the lender may have actual knowledge of the borrower's disposal of the securities" (the notional s608(8A) that ASIC Corporations (Securities Lending Arrangements) Instrument 2021/821 inserts; RG 222.67 and 222.68). The buyer is then the registered holder. While a borrower holds a lent parcel, it can sit in both the lender's and the borrower's notices; once the borrower sells it, it can sit in the lender's notice and on the register under the buyer's name. Example 3 in RG 222 walks one parcel through notices from the beneficial owner, the custodian that lent it and the hedge fund that borrowed it.

Groups report their members. MUFG's Form 603 on PLS Group, released on 16 October, counts shares in which First Sentier has a relevant interest "as Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has voting power of 100% in First Sentier Group Limited", and shares in which Morgan Stanley has one, as MUFG "has voting power of over 20% in Morgan Stanley" (s608(3)). On PLS, First Sentier (8.23%), MUFG (7.17%) and Morgan Stanley (5.31%) all have current notices on record, and across Shorted's records 24 of MUFG's 38 current holdings are at exactly First Sentier's figure. Shorted's sums count a group once, at its largest figure, which on PLS is First Sentier's; that is why PLS, with two bank or broker holders on record, is missing from the Lending desks list on the ownership page.

The figures are not from the same day. Each is as at its own notice's date of change, from 30 July to 8 October for DroneShield's four, and Shorted keeps a holding until a later notice changes it, so a 605 that could not be read leaves an older figure in place.

Shorted's stock pages list every current holder, and their sums count each interest once where the overlap is known. Other overlaps remain, which is why Shorted's methodology says that "a sum is what the notices disclose, not a share of the company."

How to read a notice

Reading a substantial holder notice
  1. Check the form

    603 means the holder became substantial, 604 that its holding moved by a percentage point or more, and 605 that it ceased. The ASX headline says the same thing.

  2. Identify the holder and its associates

    Section 1 names the holder, often a parent "and its related bodies corporate". The associates section lists the companies whose interests are included, and a group can include companies in which it has voting power above 20%.

  3. Read the voting power, now and before

    The votes and voting power are the notice's own figures, as at the date of the change. A 604 also gives the previous notice's figures, so the movement is the difference in percentage points.

  4. Read the nature of each relevant interest

    This column says whether shares are held as beneficial owner, lent out as agent lender, borrowed "subject to an obligation to return under a securities lending agreement", managed for clients or held through options. Lending annexures say who holds the voting rights and whether either side can end a loan early.

  5. Compare the date of change with the release date

    A notice reports a past date. The holder has two business days from becoming aware of the information, and ASX releases the notice after it is lodged. ASIC's short position report runs four trading days behind its position date as well.

What changes on 4 December 2026

Schedule 1 of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Financial Systems and Other Measures) Act 2025 commences on 4 December 2026, and the July versions of RG 5 and RG 222 are written for it. Three changes matter for anyone reading these notices:

  • One notice instead of three forms. Holders must use the new Substantial Holding Notice from 4 June 2027. Until then, from 4 December, they can use transitional versions of Forms 603, 604 and 605 instead (RG 222.179 and 222.180).
  • Cash-settled derivatives count too. A "deemed economic interest", exposure to shares created by a derivative, physically or cash settled, is added to relevant interests when testing the 5% threshold, to the extent relevant interests do not already reflect it (RG 5.9 and 5.10). Options and other rights to acquire shares already count, under s671B(7).
  • Offsetting short positions. These must be disclosed where they reduce or hedge a long position arising from a derivative (RG 5.9).

Where to look it up

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Substantial holding figures are each notice's own, as at its date of change, read by Shorted from notices released to 20 October 2026. Short-position figures are from ASIC's report for 15 October 2026, published four trading days after the position date. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

Share this article:
  • Guides10 min read

    A Stock Picker for the ASX: Dan Zanger's Breakout Rules, Tested Against Real Data

    Shorted's new stock picker runs four named strategies over every ASX stock we track, starting with Dan Zanger's breakout method. Every rule is scored pass, fail or unknown against published data: ASIC short positions, daily prices and volume, the S&P/ASX 200 trend and newly typed company fundamentals. Here is what each rule tests, where the numbers come from, and what the picker cannot see.

    Ben Ebsworth
  • Guides14 min read

    Activist Short Sellers on the ASX: The Major Campaigns and What Happened Next

    Glaucus, Bonitas, VGI. A short report can take a third off an ASX company in a session, and Australian outcomes have run the full range from vindication to a Supreme Court finding of misleading conduct. Here's what activist shorting is, what ASIC's INFO 255 asks of everyone involved, and how the landmark campaigns actually resolved.

    Ben Ebsworth
  • Guides12 min read

    ASX Reporting Season and Short Sellers: What August Does to Crowded Shorts

    Australian reporting season compresses hundreds of results into a few weeks in February and August. For heavily shorted stocks it is the window where a thesis either gets confirmed or gets run over, and ASIC's four-day reporting lag means you watch the covering arrive after the fact. Here is how the season works and how to read short data through it.

    Ben Ebsworth